Before
                          THE TOBYHANNA TOWNSHIP BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
                                              ---
                In Re:  Public hearing regarding the zoning map
                        change application of Management Accounting
                        and Consulting Services, Inc. representing
                        Creek View Estates.
                                              ---
                         Tobyhanna Township Government Center Building
                                          State Avenue
                                Pocono Pines, Pennsylvania 18350
                        Monday, January 14, 2008 beginning at 6:08 p.m.
                                              ---

                PRESENT:         JOHN E. KERRICK, Chairperson
                                 HEIDI A. PICKARD, Vice-Chairperson
                                 HUGH LAMBERTON, Board Member
                                 JAMIE B. KEENER, Board Member
                                 DONALD J. MOYER, Board Member
                                 JOHN B. RICE, ESQUIRE, Solicitor
                ALSO PRESENT:    PATRICK M. ARMSTRONG, ESQUIRE
                                 PHYLLIS HAASE, Zoning Officer
                                              ---
                ______________________________________________________________
                                        PANKO REPORTING
                                  537 Sarah Street, 2nd Floor
                                Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania 18360
                                         (570) 421-3620

                                                                2
        1                    MR. KERRICK:  I'd like to welcome
        2    everyone here this evening for the purposes of
        3    public hearing.  We actually have two public
        4    hearings.  First public hearing will be on the
        5    zoning map change application.  At this time I'd
        6    like to turn the hearing over to our solicitor,
        7    John Rice.
        8                    Mr. Rice?
        9                    MR. RICE:  Is there someone here for
       10    the applicant, for the zoning map change?
       11                    MR. CHARLES H. UNANGST, PE:  Yes.
       12                    MR. RICE:  Let me just briefly
       13    explain what we're going to do with this.  This has
       14    been advertised, zoning map change for a piece of
       15    property in the township.  The applicant is MAC
       16    Services, Inc.  The tax parcel is 19-20-2-36.  The
       17    development is Creek View Estates.  The proposal is
       18    simply to align adjacent commercial property lines
       19    and to increase the commercial zoning on this
       20    particular piece of property.
       21                    The public hearing has been
       22    advertised for tonight.  What I would like to do
       23    is, first of all, to ask the applicant, do you
       24    folks plan to testify in this hearing, anyone over
       25    there?

                                                                3
        1                    MR. CHARLES H. UNANGST, PE:  Yes, I
        2    will.
        3                    MR. RICE:  Okay.  Then what I would
        4    like to do is, have you sworn in.  If you can state
        5    your name, your address, what your position is with
        6    the applicant and then we'll have the court
        7    reporter swear you in.
        8                    MR. CHARLES H. UNANGST, PE:  I am
        9    Charles Unangst with Hanover Engineering.  I am the
       10    project engineer, and that's pretty much it.
       11                    MR. RICE:  Okay, Mr. Unangst.
       12                    (Charles H. Unangst, PE, was duly
       13    sworn.)
       14                    MR. RICE:  Mr. Unangst, if you could
       15    briefly explain what the proposal is before the
       16    township.  Do you have some maps or something with
       17    you?
       18                    MR. CHARLES H. UNANGST, PE:  Okay.
       19    I do have a map, it's called Rezoning Option 2.
       20    And the layout of the watts and the configured
       21    lines are the same as on the drawing that is on the
       22    board.  Would anyone like a reduced copy?  I have a
       23    number of extras.
       24                    And with that, the existing Creek
       25    View property is the entire approximately

                                                                4
        1    a-hundred-fifteen-acre site.  That's on the west
        2    side of Route 115.  Let me make sure that acreage
        3    is correct.  I believe that's what the full site
        4    is.  And what we have gone through the township
        5    with is a subdivision to -- let me step back.
        6                    The existing zoning line between the
        7    commercial and the residential is to the west side
        8    of the lot labeled as Lot No. 1; that's their
        9    current zoning line between -- the commercial is
       10    between that line and Route 115 and everything to
       11    the west of that line is the R-2 District.
       12                    If you look up to the north or the
       13    upper part of the page, there is a piece of
       14    property that we have labeled as the Blakeslee
       15    Corners property, and you can see a small portion
       16    of the western property line of that portion
       17    extending from our property straight up the page.
       18    That's their western property line, that is the
       19    existing commercial line on the adjoining property.
       20    So the existing commercial line on the property to
       21    the north is approximately 400 feet west of the
       22    commercial line on our property.
       23                    And what we are proposing to do or
       24    what we'd like to request to do is, to move the
       25    commercial line on the Creek View Estates property

                                                                5
        1    to line up with that line of the Blakeslee Corners
        2    and that property line straight down through our
        3    parcel to our southern tract line, which then to
        4    the south of that is property owned by the
        5    township.  That would create the new zoning line at
        6    the location that's shown on that drawing.
        7                    Now, with the -- we've gone through
        8    the township for the minor subdivision and in
        9    some -- trying to foresee this and trying to plan
       10    ahead, we've proposed and had approved a new
       11    property line at the location that we are proposing
       12    now to request for the rezoning to coincide with.
       13                    So there is a property line there;
       14    that plan has been approved.  I honestly don't know
       15    if the plan was recorded yet, but we've provided
       16    the documents to the township, the plans, signed
       17    and sealed, for recording.  We have final approval
       18    on that.  And that is the plan that's hung up on
       19    this board.  So anyway, there is a property line
       20    there -- or there is an approved property line
       21    there.
       22                    And, again, we're requesting that
       23    the zoning line between the C, commercial, and the
       24    R-2 gets pushed from the current location westward,
       25    approximately 500 feet to the new property line.

                                                                6
        1                    MR. RICE:  Excuse me, the plan that
        2    you're referring to, that's a plan that you drew;
        3    is that correct?
        4                    MR. CHARLES H. UNANGST, PE:  Okay,
        5    the plan that is on the board, the township put
        6    this plan on the board; this was here when we came
        7    in.  We did draw this plan.  This plan is called
        8    the preliminary/minor -- preliminary/final plan
        9    minor subdivision Creek View Estates, Sheet 1 of 1.
       10                    MR. RICE:  What's the date on that?
       11                    MR. CHARLES H. UNANGST:  It was
       12    dated May 16 of 2007 and last revised November 6 of
       13    2007.
       14                    MR. RICE:  And that includes the
       15    area that's being -- the request is directed at, it
       16    coincides with the subdivision plan that was
       17    previously approved by the township?
       18                    MR. CHARLES H. UNANGST, PE:  That is
       19    correct.
       20                    MR. RICE:  So an additional 23 and a
       21    half acres that would be rezoned from R-2 to
       22    commercial?
       23                    MR. CHARLES H. UNANGST, PE:  That is
       24    correct.
       25                    MR. RICE:  Is there anything else

                                                                7
        1    you want to tell the board such as why this should
        2    be granted by the board?
        3                    MR. CHARLES H. UNANGST, PE:  Well,
        4    what we are looking to do is, with the rezoning --
        5    again, the current rezoning -- or the current
        6    commercial site along the frontage of 115 is
        7    approximately 25.6 acres.  This would add onto an
        8    additional 23.4 acres roughly, which comes out to
        9    about 49 -- right around 49 acres.  That would
       10    leave an 87-acre residential tract to the west.
       11                    Now, there has been some
       12    discussions, my understanding, between the
       13    landowner and the township for possible purchase to
       14    create open space, but that is -- I can't talk to
       15    that, other than I've heard that and that has been
       16    discussed at public meetings so --
       17                    MR. RICE:  I just have a question.
       18    I'm not all that familiar with that property, but
       19    the R-2 piece, it gets left over, if that gets
       20    developed for a residential use, how does
       21    access get to it?
       22                    MR. CHARLES H. UNANGST, PE:  Very
       23    good point.  With the subdivision we were required
       24    to provide an access off of 115 through the
       25    existing commercial and then the Lot 2 is what we

                                                                8
        1    were calling the additional lot in between, and
        2    we're looking to rezone as commercial.  So there is
        3    a -- it's covered under an agreement and also shown
        4    on the drawing at an approximate location, an
        5    access coming off of 115 to enter or to serve Lot
        6    3.
        7                    Also, with that, there are rights
        8    with that as an easement and such to, for utilities
        9    and such if need be, to serve that property.
       10                    MR. RICE:  Does the board have any
       11    questions for --
       12                    MR. KEENER:  Just one comment, you
       13    just talked about the access which is provided for
       14    the -- in the approved subdivision plan, but it's
       15    not shown on the Rezoning Option 2 exhibit that was
       16    provided.  And I don't know if that's going to be
       17    part of the hearing.
       18                    MR. RICE:  Well, there are -- I
       19    mean, basically it's on the subdivision plan.  So
       20    once that gets recorded, that will be locked in.
       21    The zoning is just -- this request is just to
       22    change the zoning designation.
       23                    Is this what was filed with the
       24    petition, the Zoning Option 2, or was there
       25    something else filed?

                                                                9
        1                    MR. CHARLES H. UNANGST, PE:  I
        2    honestly couldn't tell you what was filed with the
        3    petition.
        4                    MR. RICE:  I mean, certainly if you
        5    want to discuss the access or ask him -- I'm not
        6    sure they'll know at this point until they have a
        7    development proposed, what exactly that will look
        8    like but --
        9                    MR. KEENER:  No, I think legally we
       10    have the access.  I just don't like seeing a
       11    discrepancy with the plan that's submitted,
       12    although it's just for the zoning.
       13                    MR. RICE:  You're not wiping away
       14    the access if this would get approved?
       15                    MR. CHARLES H. UNANGST, PE:  And if
       16    you look at the Rezoning Option 2, that was a
       17    concept prior to the approval of this plan, that if
       18    you look there aren't even bearings and distances
       19    on that line, but that line, as a condition, if the
       20    board would grant that, would be along the approved
       21    line with bearings and distances as shown on the
       22    subdivision plan.
       23                    MR. KEENER:  Another question I have
       24    is, relative to the Bird property that's in our
       25    parcel, that's really encompassed by --

                                                               10
        1                    MS. PICKARD:  It was sold, I
        2    believe.
        3                    MR. RICE:  Mr. Unangst, do you know
        4    the status of that outparcel?
        5                    MR. CHARLES H. UNANGST, PE:  I do
        6    not know the ownership status, but this portion in
        7    here was -- shows up on your zoning map as
        8    commercial.  And I --
        9                    MR. RICE:  The whole piece?  Isn't
       10    there a little piece that --
       11                    MR. CHARLES H. UNANGST, PE:  There's
       12    a small piece to the west.
       13                    MR. RICE:  Is that in the R-2?
       14                    MR. CHARLES H. UNANGST, PE:  That's
       15    in the R-2.
       16                    MR. RICE:  But you don't know what
       17    the status of it is, whether it's been sold or
       18    there are people living --
       19                    MR. CHARLES H. UNANGST, PE:  I do
       20    not.  I don't believe there's anyone living there,
       21    no.
       22                    MR. RICE:  No?  Okay.
       23                    Does the board have any other
       24    questions or comments?  The township has received
       25    some comments from the Monroe County Planning

                                                               11
        1    Commission.  We have a letter dated January 10,
        2    2008, and it -- Monroe County has several -- well,
        3    a handful of comments.  It is recommending that the
        4    zoning map amendment be adopted subject to the
        5    comments.
        6                    Does the board want to discuss any
        7    of these comments with the applicant at this point?
        8                    MR. KEENER:  It's relative to Item
        9    6.  Is it possible for us to put in a landscape
       10    buffer restriction on it at this point?
       11                    MR. RICE:  No, not at this point.  I
       12    think that that's going to be a land development
       13    issue when someone comes in to develop the larger
       14    tract.  It's not something we can add to a zoning
       15    amendment.
       16                    Let me just, for anybody that's
       17    here, when the township passes zoning amendments,
       18    supervisors, they act in a legislative capacity.
       19    It's a little different from what they do with
       20    subdivisions and land developments or conditional
       21    uses or PRDs; they're more like judges when you
       22    vote on those things.
       23                    This is a legislative decision,
       24    there really isn't any appeal from an adverse
       25    decision for an applicant if there's a zoning

                                                               12
        1    amendment denied.  So it's a little different than
        2    some of the other types of decisions that the
        3    supervisors render, but buffers and what that
        4    accessway would look like back there and their land
        5    development issues, they would be dealt with once a
        6    land development plan would get filed.
        7                    The only other comments, as I said,
        8    Monroe County Planning Commission does recommend
        9    adoption.  And the other document which we received
       10    was a -- this is a public hearing.  We did receive
       11    a letter from an adjacent property owner, Mr.
       12    Hannig, from Spread Eagle Associates and I'll
       13    just -- this is a letter dated December 20, 2007.
       14                    And Mr. Hannig, on behalf of the
       15    Hannig Development Company, is in support of the
       16    zoning amendment for basically three reasons:  He
       17    is developing an adjacent residential community;
       18    services that would be provided in a larger
       19    commercial district would be in close proximity to
       20    that development, which is proposed to be
       21    residential.
       22                    Mr. Hannig further states in his
       23    letter that the rezoning would create a better
       24    critical mass for commercial development planning,
       25    access and design.  And thirdly, he believes that

                                                               13
        1    aligning the depth of the commercial zone with the
        2    existing commercial property lines would be in the
        3    best interest of the township and there would be
        4    increase in services and its tax base would be
        5    increased, commercial rezoning.  So that letter is
        6    dated December 20, 2007.  That's part of this
        7    hearing.
        8                    Mr. Unangst, is there anything else
        9    you want to add at this point?
       10                    MR. CHARLES H. UNANGST, PE:  No, not
       11    really.
       12                    Nothing else?
       13                    No.  Thank you.
       14                    MR. RICE:  If the board doesn't have
       15    any other comments, I would open this up then for
       16    any public comment or any questions from the
       17    public.  This is a public hearing, an advertised
       18    public hearing.
       19                    So is there any public comment on
       20    this application and proposal?
       21                    Sir, please state your name and
       22    address.
       23                    MR. JOHN HENRY:  I'm John Henry.  My
       24    address is 1 Ice House Road, Pocono Lake Preserve,
       25    18348.  And I just -- Open Space Committee asked me

                                                               14
        1    to stop by; I'm a member of the Township Open Space
        2    Committee.
        3                    And we'd like to go on the record as
        4    saying that -- I think it's -- Parcel 3 is the
        5    remaining R-2 zone, and just to remind the board
        6    that part of the Open Space Committee's interest in
        7    that property, it's adjacent to the (inaudible)
        8    natural area, and there's pieces of that property
        9    that would be a wonderful addition to the open
       10    space natural area in that Parcel 3.  And I don't
       11    think the zoning change impacts that at all.
       12                    I know the committee just asked me
       13    to put that on the record for tonight.
       14                    MR. RICE:  Thank you.  And that was
       15    a comment from Monroe County Planning Commission
       16    also in their letter of January 10.
       17                    Any other public comment on this
       18    application?
       19                    Okay.  What I would -- what's the
       20    board's pleasure?  Let me just, in terms of
       21    procedure, assuming the board is inclined to
       22    approve this, the next step would be for the board
       23    to make a motion tonight in favor of the proposed
       24    zoning map amendment and authorize our office to
       25    prepare an ordinance, because this has to be done

                                                               15
        1    ultimately by an ordinance, which means that will
        2    be advertised and there will be another public
        3    hearing on that ordinance before this gets finally
        4    adopted.
        5                    So if that's the pleasure of the
        6    board or not, that would be your next step.
        7                    MR. KERRICK:  Question.  Would that
        8    be done at the close of this hearing in our regular
        9    or could we do it at this time?
       10                    MR. RICE:  You could do it at this
       11    time, absolutely; but we would have to -- we still
       12    have to draft an ordinance referencing the tax
       13    parcel.  It would be a very simple ordinance,
       14    pretty much boilerplate, just referencing this.  I
       15    probably would need a plan and a legal description
       16    for the area that would be rezoned.
       17                    MR. CHARLES H. UNANGST, PE:  Sure.
       18                    MR. RICE:  That's something the
       19    township engineer is going to have to check to make
       20    sure that that's accurate.  That's a detail, it
       21    still has to be done by an ordinance.  And if the
       22    board's inclined to move forward, the vote would be
       23    in order to authorize so that would be done.
       24                    MS. PICKARD:  I do have one
       25    question.  On the tax map parcel number, we have --

                                                               16
        1    I believe the plans are over here to be signed and
        2    recorded for the subdivision so there may be
        3    different tax map numbers assigned to those
        4    parcels.  I think the number that you had read
        5    would probably be for the entire parcel.
        6                    MR. RICE:  Right, but that's -- I
        7    don't know how Monroe County would assign this.
        8    That's all one parcel now.  Probably Lot 3 would
        9    remain the mother parcel, the original parcel, and
       10    then they'd probably assign a new number to the
       11    side two lots that are zoned commercial.  But, you
       12    know, we can -- as I said, there's going to need to
       13    be an ordinance.
       14                    And if Mr. Unangst prepares a legal
       15    description, that would be part of the ordinance
       16    and that would be what ultimately gets put on the
       17    record.
       18                    MR. KEENER:  Mr. Chairman, I'll make
       19    a motion we approve the zoning map change for Creek
       20    View Estates based on the final -- or based on the
       21    Rezoning Option 2 plan of 23.3527 acres from R-2 to
       22    commercial, subject to the applicant providing a
       23    legal description and subject to a hearing on the
       24    ordinance change.
       25                    MR. RICE:  Yeah, preparation of an

                                                               17
        1    ordinance and then the public hearing will deal
        2    with that.
        3                    MR. KEENER:  And is that authorizing
        4    our solicitor to prepare the ordinance?
        5                    MR. RICE:  Yes.
        6                    MS. PICKARD:  I'll second the
        7    motion.
        8                    MR. KERRICK:  You're running the
        9    hearing so you call the vote or do I call the vote?
       10    There's a motion and second on the floor.
       11                    MR. RICE:  You should call the vote.
       12                    MR. KERRICK:  Motion and second on
       13    the floor.
       14                    Any questions from the board?
       15                    Questions or comments from the
       16    public on the motion?
       17                    Call the vote?
       18                    Jaime?
       19                    MR. KEENER:  I vote in favor.
       20                    MR. KERRICK:  Donny?
       21                    MR. MOYER:  I vote in favor.
       22                    MR. KERRICK:  Hugh?
       23                    MR. LAMBERTON:  I vote in favor.
       24                    MR. KERRICK:  Heidi?
       25                    MS. PICKARD:  I vote in favor.

                                                               18
        1                    MR. KERRICK:  I'll vote in favor.
        2    Motion carried.
        3                    MR. RICE:  Okay.  With that, this
        4    hearing is closed.
        5                    MR. CHARLES H. UNANGST, PE:  Thank
        6    you, very much.
        7                    MR. RICE:  The second matter that
        8    was advertised for tonight was a hearing on a
        9    proposed Pocono Manor Planned Residential
       10    Development.  The applicant has continued that
       11    hearing, there will be no hearing on that tonight;
       12    it will be readvertised for another night, the same
       13    notice.  And the board is not going to hold any
       14    hearing on that tonight until we get another date
       15    for that.
       16                    There is a zoning hearing board
       17    matter involving that property, I believe,
       18    January 30.  And I assume the PRD hearing will be
       19    held subsequent -- some date subsequent to that
       20    zoning hearing board hearing, sometime in February
       21    or possibly later.  The 30th or 31st?
       22                    MS. PICKARD:  The 31st.
       23                    MR. RICE:  31st, January 31 is the
       24    zoning hearing board's decision.
       25                    MR. KERRICK:  At this time we'll

                                                               19
        1    adjourn to 7 p.m. where we'll pick up our regular
        2    business meeting.  Thank you.
        3                    (Hearing concluded at 6:33 p.m.)
        4                             ---
        5
        6
        7
        8
        9
       10
       11
       12
       13
       14
       15
       16
       17
       18
       19
       20
       21
       22
       23
       24
       25

                                                               20
        1
        2
        3
        4
        5
        6
        7                    I hereby certify that the
        8    proceedings and evidence are contained fully and
        9    accurately in the notes taken by me, to the best of
       10    my ability, at the hearing in the above matter; and
       11    that the foregoing is a true and correct transcript
       12    of the same.
       13
       14
       15                                ______________________
       16                                EVILYS E. BRATHWAITE
       17
       18
       19
       20
       21
       22
       23
       24
       25